I find it intriguing how some people can justify the character's lack of morality in the story, considering her decision not to pursue a professional athelete career and the fear her family, friends, and peers exhibit towards her. Here's a hypothetical scenario: A young girl bravely saved her friend from a life-threatening attack by a large, vicious dog in a playground, risking her own life in the process. Despite her heroic act, she sustained severe injuries that left her unconscious due to blood loss.
In a morally upright society, would anyone fear such a hero or condemn the dog owner instead? In fact, wouldn't there be calls for stricter regulations against large dogs in playgrounds? However, the girl's own parents react with fear and distance, which raises questions about their ability to care for her. As an only child, this situation raises concerns about their suitability as parents.
The author's narrative seems disconnected from reality, as the girl's parents are deceased, leaving her without societal support. From a young age, she must work grueling 100-hour weeks, though it's unclear whether it's out of necessity or choice. All this drama and trauma feel unnecessary, given that the story revolves around gaming live streaming, which could have been handled differently without resorting to clichés.
Additionally, while becoming a professional gamer might be challenging, the author suggests it's easier to become a successful streamer, which seems inconsistent. A more compelling storyline would have involved the protagonist transitioning from a professional athelete to a streamer. Unfortunately, the current story lacks depth and finds its interest mainly in the gaming world, which isn't particularly captivating on its own.