The King Of Arsenal - Reviews

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

will some one please pick this novel again and upload new chapters.

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

it has great potential but there are some things that are just stupid             why this novel is bad 1 abilities are op when they are just common example: an archer goblin has a skill that makes you invisible If you are still and not breathing I said why it is op in a paragraph comment when it got introduced(it basically is perfect for ambush  hiding and confusing your enemy) archer goblins have a skill called archers reinforcement or something it gives an enchantment to ALL weapons not only bows all weapons a sage has a skill that shows every living being in 100 meters ( it hard counters assassin's with stealth making them useless and remember this is a common skill and  there are like 5 more ranks) 2 the mc can hit small targets from a distance with a bow without missing when it's the first time that he uses one ( he doesn't have any skills that help with aiming or stats that help yet) the same with a sword he became an expert with 1 hour of experience3 I found an exploit ? when he enslaves a monster ( with a skill) he can give it a name when it  gets a name it evolves meaning it gives more xp when killed and also gets an additional skill which he can devour ? my opinion of the novel: if you don't care if the system or character makes sense read it if you don't like bad quality go as far away from this piece of art :)

It has some dark vibes to it which I really like and just reading this I feel like I have a bit of a connection with it...it makes me think a lot about life itself

Hello, Author here,This review is after 31 chapters. I've made quite a few mistakes and I know that and first few chapters aren't interesting as this is my first time writing a novel. but as the story progresses it is becoming quite a good novel to read, at least this is what I think.As for what your guys who are regular readers of my novel think, Please give your review and rate it so that your fellow readers and I can know what you think about it.As for the new readers, please give it a try and leave your review.

"im bored lets kill evrything"

"He is a beast!!!" she then fainted.

After three days... The Schedule of the Surgery...

"...What is it?" Bork's ears perked up a bit at Walter's words, which of course Walter noticed.

Truman Capote's 1958 Breakfast at Tiffany's(26,433 words) is often thought of as longer, probably because of the well-known 1961 film version with George Peppard and Audrey Hepburn: The masses tend to believe that if it's a movie, it must've been a novel. While the film does follow the basic plot of Capote's original, there are significant differences, especially in terms of the endings; the original is much darker, much more realistic than George and Audrey (a.k.a. "Fred" and Holly) kissing in the rain. It is among Capote's best prose work, and more characters are developed than is possible in a typical short story. Teachers who expose their students to Capote often use his 1966 nonfiction novel In Cold Blood. If an American literature teacher would like to include Capote in the repertoire but there isn't enough time for In Cold Blood, Breakfast at Tiffany's is a great alternative.