I have to talk about the dialogue in this section because it is absolutely ferocious. Every line feels like a blade being drawn slowly from its sheath.
Let me start with Jiang Xingzhou's voice. His dialogue is never just dialogue. It is performance. It is theater. When he says Who else do you wish to find? — that is not a question. That is a threat wrapped in curiosity. The casualness of his tone makes it worse. He is not shouting. He is asking like he genuinely wants to know, and that is what makes it terrifying.
And then there is the line that broke me: You have driven me mad, Feng Yi. You have ruined my ability to live a normal life, yet you dare to seek happiness with another man for the rest of your days? This is the kind of dialogue that reveals character through self-incrimination. He is not just saying he is obsessed. He is admitting that she has ruined him, and he is using that ruin as justification for his own cruelty. The logic is twisted, but the voice is authentic. This is a man who believes his own madness.
Feng Yi's voice is equally distinctive. She does not beg. She does not plead. Her dialogue is sparse but devastating. Yanqing, please go home first. I will be fine. Please, leave. This is not submission. This is protection. She is using words as a shield for Wen Qing, and the reader feels every ounce of that sacrifice.
But then her voice changes. When she says I will consume you whole. Do you understand? — that is a new Feng Yi. That is not the gentle stream the author described earlier. That is something else entirely. The dialogue here is short, sharp, and absolute. She is not asking. She is declaring war.
The dialogue between them during the intimate scene is where the author truly shines. Jiang Xingzhou: Mianmian, I would advise you not to shout. If you startle me, I cannot guarantee my aim will stay true — these arrows might land on people instead. This is dialogue as psychological torture. He is not just threatening her. He is threatening her compassion. He knows she will not shout because she will not risk innocent lives. The dialogue reveals his understanding of her psychology, and that understanding is weaponized.
And Feng Yi's response: I will go back with you. Before you leave, will you stay and watch a display of fireworks with me? This is dialogue as manipulation. She is playing his game, but she is changing the rules. The fireworks are not a gift. They are a threat. And the reader knows it.
The most powerful dialogue in the section comes at the end, during the intimate scene. Jiang Xingzhou: Linyuan. Yes? Find a reliable teacher to take over the academy, will you? Very well. Linyuan, do not hurt He Yun or Yangyang. I promise. And do not make things difficult for Yue Ming. Agreed.
This exchange is devastating. Feng Yi is negotiating for the people she loves while lying in the arms of the man who is destroying her world. The dialogue is clinical, almost bureaucratic. But the subtext is screaming. Every agreement is a wound. Every promise is a reminder of what she has lost.
And Jiang Xingzhou's final line: Anything else? He asked, his throat tight with a fresh surge of bitterness — she was still only thinking of everyone else but him. This is the dialogue that reveals everything. He is not just jealous of other men. He is jealous of her compassion. He wants to be the only person she thinks about, and the fact that she cannot give him that — that is his true torment.
The narrative voice throughout is also remarkable. The author uses free indirect discourse to blur the line between narrator and character. When we read She realized then that she and Jiang Xingzhou were probably cut from the same cloth — this is Feng Yi's thought, but it is also the narrator's commentary. The voice is intimate without being intrusive. It reveals psychology without explaining it.
The dialogue in this section is not just conversation. It is combat. Every line is a move in a game where the stakes are life, death, and everything in between. And the author writes it with the precision of a swordsman.